To delve or not to delve: AI detection made easy?

There’s growing controversy online about the use of the word “delve” as an easy detector of whether a text has been written by an AI. I have to admit that I’m personally sad to see the word “delve” go, I realised that I used it regularly, even before AI (hey, I’m in the training data, maybe it learned it from me?) I won’t delve into this issue (see what I did there?), this is supposed to be a short throwaway post. However, there are indeed quite a few words that are over-used by AI, particularly ChatGPT 3.5. I asked it to produce an abstract for an essay dealing with the legal regulation of artificial intelligence. This is what it produced. It’s filled with common AI words, if I was reading this in an essay or an article, I would immediately suspect that it was written by an LLM. The title itself contains some major ChatGPT tells. I’ve highlighted the overused AI words.

“Title: Navigating the Legal Labyrinth: Complexities in Regulating Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has spurred a myriad of legal and regulatory challenges, reflecting the intricate interplay between technological advancement and legal frameworks. This abstract explores the multifaceted complexities inherent in the legal regulation of AI. It delves into various dimensions, including but not limited to ethical considerations, accountability, liability, privacy, and intellectual property rights. Ethical dilemmas arise as AI systems make autonomous decisions with profound societal implications, raising questions about the ethical frameworks guiding their development and deployment. Accountability and liability issues blur traditional lines of responsibility, as the opaque nature of AI algorithms complicates attribution of errors or harms. Privacy concerns loom large, as AI-driven data processing capabilities challenge established notions of consent and personal data protection. Furthermore, the intersection of AI and intellectual property law poses novel challenges regarding ownership and protection of AI-generated content. Addressing these complexities requires a nuanced approach that balances innovation with risk mitigation, fostering collaborative efforts among policymakers, industry stakeholders, and legal experts. This abstract underscores the imperative for comprehensive and adaptable legal frameworks that can effectively govern the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.”

I’ll be right back delving into some intricate complexities.